W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > December 2002

some more SpecGL topics

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:47:38 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021217124419.02939720@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

I don't expect that we will be able to resolve all open SpecGL topics by 
tomorrow, but for the record ... Dom highlights some SpecGL problems in his 
SpecGL review of OpsGL.  See for example CP3.3.

-Lofton.

>Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:01:08 -0500 (EST)
>From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
>To: www-qa-wg@w3.org, lofton@rockynet.com
>X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5
>Date: 13 Dec 2002 18:01:03 +0100
>Subject: Review of QA-Ops through SpecGL
>X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/1039798864.667.155.camel@stratustier
>Resent-From: www-qa-wg@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <www-qa-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/1276
>X-Loop: www-qa-wg@w3.org
>Sender: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org
>List-Id: <www-qa-wg.w3.org>
>List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-qa-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>
>Hi,
>
>I just completed my assignment to review QA-Ops through SpecGL:
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/12/qaframe-ops-specGL-review
>
>linked from
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews
>
>My other assignment for review of QA WG through QA ops will most
>probably not been done for Monday, but I hope to do it for Tuesday,
>though.
>
>Dom
>--
>Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/INRIA
>mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2002 14:46:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT