W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > December 2002

OpsGL CP6.1

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:33:49 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021206171012.03f83e10@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG,

Here is an OpsGL left-over from 25-nov -- an issue with CP6.1 [1] and a 
proposed solution.

Please read.  If you don't like the proposal, then reply and we will 
discuss it on telecon agenda.

 From the 25-nov OpsGL issues message [2]:

CP6.1:  The last sentence doesn't belong -- the first part is about 
maintenance of the Rec and of the TS, not repository.  The last part is 
about persistent repository.  Quote:
"If the Working Group ceases to operate, then successors responsible for 
ongoing interpretation and maintenance (errata) of the standard should be 
designated to ensure continued availability of the test suite."

Proposal:  reword the sentence to pertain to repository, and tie it into 
the "Discussion" so as to indicate that this is one aspect of the
MUST requirements for "secure and reliable repository". Also, put something 
similar to original wording at the appropriate place in CP8.1 -- indicating 
that TM maintenance (and by implication, Rec maintenance) must continue 
through the Rec's life-cycle even if the WG dissolves.

-Lofton.

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/11/qaframe-ops-20021111#Ck-secure-repository
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Nov/0082.html
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 18:32:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT