W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Clarification on spec categories [was: Where "Rules for Profiles" fit into Spec Guidelines]

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:12:55 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020821100847.039b59f0@rockynet.com>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Opinions please...

I want to make sure that this contribution doesn't get lost.  What should 
we do with it:

1.) Link it from SpecGL draft for pending publication?
2.) Link it from SpecExtech draft?
3.) other?

-Lofton.

At 06:04 PM 8/12/02 +0200, you wrote:

>Le lun 12/08/2002 ŗ 16:08, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux a ťcrit :
> > Another good thing would be to provide a table with the current W3C
> > Recommendations and the categories where they fit [not in the framework,
> > but as a companion document in /QA/ space for instance].
>
>Here is an attempt of creating such a table:
>http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/08/rec_categories
>
>I'm not sure if it will prove useful in better shaping the categories,
>but at least it can help show what we mean behind them. David, could you
>check that I indeed got the idea that where behind your classification?
>
>There a few spec that I'm unsure what category fit them best (they are
>backed in green on the said page). I'm happy to take any suggestions on
>them.
>
>Dom
>--
>Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/INRIA
>mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 12:12:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:10 GMT