W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2002

SpecGL issues/highlights -- leftovers

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:01:27 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

QAWG participants --

Here are the leftovers from yesterday's telecon agenda.  If any of these 
look like big or debatable issues, let's enter them as issues and debate 
them later (on the IG list).

For now, I'm look for (temporary, at least) closure so that we can publish.

------------------rules for profiles---------------------
-- rules for profiles as a CoP (Class of Product): GL2, CK2.3, CK3.6

Proposal.  Only clean up a little wording problem in CK3.6.  (See next 

Okay?  (after you see next message)

------------------discretionary items---------------------
-- GL8 discretionary
	* new bullet list (choice, options, impl-dep)
	* new implementation-dependent checkpoint?

This was mostly for review of 3-way bullet list of types of discretionary 

But there is an open question about whether there ought to be a new 
checkpoint: if implementation dependent features/values are allowed by the 
specification, then there must be a statement about expected 
interoperability effects.  I liked the idea, David thought it was not 

Other opinions?  (See end of GL8 verbiage.)

  ------------------register extensions---------------------
-- CK9.5, register extensions
	* (criticized in QAWG project review)


P.S.  And there is this...


Dom will draft text, which will be integrated into 8/29 editor draft...

-- Dominique's "specification" vs. "technology" issue
(see "@@spec-tech" in editor draft)
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 11:01:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:28 UTC