W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2002

SpecGL issues/highlights for telecon

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 18:01:46 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

QAWG participants --

The new editor draft of SpecGL and checklist are posted.

Reference document(s):
(Ignore messed up header in latter -- table is correct.)

This will be the main topic for the Wednesday (11-aug) telecon.  Lots of 
changes -- please have a careful look before the telecon.

We want to spend most of the time on Checkpoint priorities review.  In 
dealing with checkpoint priorities,

** We will discuss change requests first.
** So, look at the priorities, email change requests.
** Then we will go consecutively through as many of the remainders as time 

There are also some other specific issues.  We will dispose of these as 
fast as possible (less than 1/2 hour), or else postpone them until after 

So I propose we process like this:

1.) Specific priority change requests.
2.) Other specific issues below.
3.) All other checkpoint priorities, as time permits.

Specific issues:

-- Minimally have a look at all "@@" flags.

-- Look at SoTD
	* does it satisfy 7-aug decisions?
	* which issues should we flag for publication?

-- Dominique's "specification" vs. "techology" issue
(see "@@spec-tech" in editor draft)

-- GL8 discretionary
	* new bullet list (choice, options, impl-dep)
	* new implementation-dependent checkpoint?

-- issues in CK1.1 and CK1.2

-- negative disclaimers in DoV, relative to CK10.1/10.2

-- rules for profiles as a CoP (Class of Product): GL2, CK2.3, CK3.6

-- CK9.5, register extensions
	* (criticized in QAWG project review)

Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 20:01:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:28 UTC