W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: A few comments on SpecGL -- part 4

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 15:01:56 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020802150002.034f0dd0@rockynet.com>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 05:36 PM 8/2/02 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:

>Le ven 02/08/2002 ŗ 17:24, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> > That still has a future flavor to it, albeit very deliberate.  I am still
> > curious if anyone has an example of "XYZ First Edition", in which it was
> > published initially with two levels completely defined internally.
>
>This is nowadays achieved by the use of profiles, I would say (XHTML
>basic/XHTML 1.1; SVG Tiny/SVG 1.1).

I think this is right, but was fishing for a counter-example.  I propose to 
mention it in our GL.7 clarifying verbiage, but also to indicate that its 
actual use is rare or non-existent (maybe even say "discouraged").

-Lofton.
Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 16:58:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:10 GMT