W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Fwd: Request for commitment to review Charmod Last Call #2

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:57:47 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020418095315.02fecdd0@rockynet.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Karl,

Since we (QA) are on the list for "request for commitment to review", what 
do we need to do?

Do we need to give i18n a Y/N answer about whether we will review and 
comment?  (Not that we would say "N", but is "N" even an option?)

Should we appoint a task team to review and draft a response, then endorse 
the response (before 5/31) in whole QAWG?

-Lofton.

At 06:20 PM 4/18/02 +0900, Karl Dubost wrote:
>A request from I18N WG about Character Model.
>
>Forward---------debut
>>From: Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
>>Message-ID: <T5a4cfecd84c407b70686c@reuters.com>
>>Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:42:23 +0100
>>Subject: Request for commitment to review Charmod Last Call #2
>>
>>Dear Chairs,
>>
>>The original Last Call for the Character Model for the World Wide Web
>>started on 26 January 2001:
>>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-charmod-20010126/
>>
>>Owing to the large number of comments:
>>    http://www.w3.org/International/Group/charmod-lc/
>>it has taken the I18N WG till now to process them all, resulting in the
>>current internal draft:
>>    http://www.w3.org/International/Group/charmod-edit/
>>
>>And, owing to the large number of changes, we'll be going to a Last Call
>>#2 (I'm reminded of Steven Pemberton's quip at the recent Technical
>>Plenary regarding the meaning of "Last" in "Last Call").
>>
>>The I18N WG decided today to go to Last Call #2 on 30 April, or sooner
>>if ready:
>>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-wg/2002Apr/0112
>>
>>We are asking the following WGs to review the document, once it has been
>>published (no later than 30 April), and to complete their review by 31
>>May:
>>
>>    -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    WG        Asked   Response  Contacting
>>    -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    CSS         Y        Y      Bert Bos
>>    DOM         Y        Y      Philippe Le Hégaret
>>    HTML        Y        Y      Steven Pemberton
>>    QA                   -      Karl Dubost
>>    RDF                  -      Brian McBride/Dan Brickley
>>    TAG         Y        -      Chris Lilley
>>    WAI PF      Y        Y      Al Gilman
>>    WS Arch              -      Chris Ferris
>>    XForms      Y        Y      Steven Pemberton
>>    XML Core             -      Paul Grosso/Arnaud Le Hors
>>    XMLP                 -      David Fallside
>>    XML Query            -      Paul Cotton
>>    XML Schema           -      Michael Sperberg-McQueen/Dave Hollander
>>    XML Sig              -      Joseph Reagle/Donald Eastlake
>>    XSL                  -      Sharon Adler
>>    -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>If you've received this mail and haven't yet let us know whether your
>>WG will review the document once it has been published (no later than
>>30 April), please let us know whether you will do so and whether you
>>will complete your review by 31 May.
>>
>>We will, of course, welcome comments from other WGs (and others).  If
>>your WG isn't listed above and wishes to review the document, please
>>let us know.
>>
>>Many thanks,
>>Misha Wolf
>>I18N WG Chair
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------- --
>>         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>>
>>Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
>>sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
>>the views of Reuters Ltd.
>Forward---------fin
>--
>Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
>           http://www.w3.org/QA/
>
>      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 11:57:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT