- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:57:47 -0600
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Karl, Since we (QA) are on the list for "request for commitment to review", what do we need to do? Do we need to give i18n a Y/N answer about whether we will review and comment? (Not that we would say "N", but is "N" even an option?) Should we appoint a task team to review and draft a response, then endorse the response (before 5/31) in whole QAWG? -Lofton. At 06:20 PM 4/18/02 +0900, Karl Dubost wrote: >A request from I18N WG about Character Model. > >Forward---------debut >>From: Misha.Wolf@reuters.com >>Message-ID: <T5a4cfecd84c407b70686c@reuters.com> >>Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:42:23 +0100 >>Subject: Request for commitment to review Charmod Last Call #2 >> >>Dear Chairs, >> >>The original Last Call for the Character Model for the World Wide Web >>started on 26 January 2001: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-charmod-20010126/ >> >>Owing to the large number of comments: >> http://www.w3.org/International/Group/charmod-lc/ >>it has taken the I18N WG till now to process them all, resulting in the >>current internal draft: >> http://www.w3.org/International/Group/charmod-edit/ >> >>And, owing to the large number of changes, we'll be going to a Last Call >>#2 (I'm reminded of Steven Pemberton's quip at the recent Technical >>Plenary regarding the meaning of "Last" in "Last Call"). >> >>The I18N WG decided today to go to Last Call #2 on 30 April, or sooner >>if ready: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-wg/2002Apr/0112 >> >>We are asking the following WGs to review the document, once it has been >>published (no later than 30 April), and to complete their review by 31 >>May: >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WG Asked Response Contacting >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> CSS Y Y Bert Bos >> DOM Y Y Philippe Le Hégaret >> HTML Y Y Steven Pemberton >> QA - Karl Dubost >> RDF - Brian McBride/Dan Brickley >> TAG Y - Chris Lilley >> WAI PF Y Y Al Gilman >> WS Arch - Chris Ferris >> XForms Y Y Steven Pemberton >> XML Core - Paul Grosso/Arnaud Le Hors >> XMLP - David Fallside >> XML Query - Paul Cotton >> XML Schema - Michael Sperberg-McQueen/Dave Hollander >> XML Sig - Joseph Reagle/Donald Eastlake >> XSL - Sharon Adler >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>If you've received this mail and haven't yet let us know whether your >>WG will review the document once it has been published (no later than >>30 April), please let us know whether you will do so and whether you >>will complete your review by 31 May. >> >>We will, of course, welcome comments from other WGs (and others). If >>your WG isn't listed above and wishes to review the document, please >>let us know. >> >>Many thanks, >>Misha Wolf >>I18N WG Chair >> >> >> >> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------- -- >> Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com >> >>Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual >>sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be >>the views of Reuters Ltd. >Forward---------fin >-- >Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager > http://www.w3.org/QA/ > > --- Be Strict To Be Cool! --- >
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 11:57:42 UTC