W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Telcin discussion items

From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:16:39 -0700
Message-ID: <B3F0DACD72892E4DB7E8296C6C9FC2F605074ECE@red-msg-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris@ontologicon.com>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Dimitris!
Wanted to double check  - is your intent to 
1. use schemas as language to write specifications or 
2. to use the same schema for the XHTML version of all the W3C specs. 

I agree with 2, I'm opposed to 1 since it's not possible.



-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitris Dimitriadis [mailto:dimitris@ontologicon.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:50 PM
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Subject: Telcin discussion items


QA WG,

below please find the items for discussion I propose for my part of the 
introduction to the Specification guidelines document:

1. motivation for using advanced schemata for specificaiton authoring 2.
benefits (better control over information extraction, normative 
specification generation as well as automated test assertions) 3. Look
at what is being done in Wg's 4. Rules for spec authoring similar to pub
rules that exist today

I hope to have discussion on:
1. added effort on behalf of WG's
2. how to generate the normative schema(ta) to use when authoring a 
specification
3. generalized framework for generating normative (html) versions of 
specifications

/Dimitris
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 20:17:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT