I applaud the submissions by <a href= "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/1310.html"> OSI</a> and <a href= "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/2001Oct/1350.html"> Mozilla.org</a> Both present convincing arguments against RAND licensing in W3C Recommendations. It's my firm belief that no Recommendation is preferable to one with RAND (or UFAD == "UnFair And Discriminatory") licensing by any member of the working group that developed the Recommendation. GlennReceived on Wednesday, 10 October 2001 08:57:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:22 GMT