- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 12:24:37 -0600
- To: www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org
From the XML Schema for P3P,
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-P3P-20010928/#Appendix_schema
This seems allowed:
<POLICY>
<ENTITY>
<DATA-GROUP>
<DATA ref="#business.name">
<CATEGORIES><demographic/></CATEGORIES>
</DATA>
</DATA-GROUP>
</ENTITY>
...
</POLICY>
What would that mean? Why allow <CATEGORIES> in
<ENTITY>? i.e. why re-use the DATA-GROUP syntax?
It doesn't seem to buy anything.
fyi... I'm writing something that converts P3P policy
files to RDF,
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/p3p/grokPolicy.xsl
trying to see if I can do an APPEL-work-alike
using some Semantic Web Advanced Development stuff...
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/p3p/Makefile
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/
see also: #rdfig discussion
http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2001-12-05#T17-05-19
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 13:24:37 UTC