Re: MIT privacy first responce, field testing?

RE: MIT privacy first responce, field testing?I also suspec there are lots of media who are subscribed to the list interested in how PGP may be actually a invation of privacy by placing a cookie on one's computer, so if my message gets out to the media and to the appropriate people at MIT, what do I care? Speeking of PGP, I guess not everyone believes in the freedom of speech? I know I am on the correct list, posting the correct messages, so please stop telling me what to right?




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Stephen Howard-Sarin 
  To: JIM VAGLIA 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 11:34 PM
  Subject: RE: MIT privacy first responce, field testing?


  Jim,

  Please, please stop sending your messages to the P3P list. Your questions and issues are broad -- and need to be addresses by much bigger groups that this one. Our interest is in a narrow area of privacy protocols. Your questions are far larger.

  Stephen


   -----Original Message-----
  From:   JIM VAGLIA [mailto:jimjv@verizon.net]
  Sent:   Wed Mar 01 19:34:18 2006
  To:     U.S Justice department
  Cc:     www-p3p-policy@w3.org
  Subject:        MIT privacy first responce, field testing?

  Speaking of privacy issues, I would love to know why MIT tests products in the public safety, military fields that are not government approved?