W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-policy@w3.org > January 2002

RE: Compact versus full P3P policy?

From: Clifford Lyon <Clifford.Lyon@cnet.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:26:29 -0800
Message-ID: <F5E5CB897FCA1A4BAC3FD38CEBA1A644F91DEE@zdnet08.zdz.cnwk>
To: "'www-p3p-policy@w3.org'" <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Any comments from the w3 on the information at the pointer below?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Wright [mailto:Ben_Wright@compuserve.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:57 PM
To: INTERNET:www-p3p-policy@w3.org
Subject: Compact versus full P3P policy?


Message text written by INTERNET:www-p3p-policy@w3.org
>What is the general view on whether it's better to code your privacy
statement into a compact P3P policy or a full P3P policy?<

I don't know what the general view is.  However, I believe the P3P language
is dangerous for corporations and government agencies to use.  Those
organizations may want to disavow any liability or legal responsibility for
P3P stuff.  They may find it safer to state all privacy matters in full,
plain English so as to avoid misunderstandings in court.  See
http://www.disavowp3p.com

--Ben

Benjamin Wright
Dallas, Texas
tel 214-403-6642
ben_wright@compuserve.com
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 18:27:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 January 2012 12:13:10 GMT