W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-policy@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Compact versus full P3P policy?

From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:35:25 -0500
Message-ID: <001b01c1a9a3$bce0ff70$9816cf87@barbaloot>
To: "Rodgers, Philippa" <philippa.rodgers@attws.com>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
The P3P specification requires that all P3P-compliant
web sites have full P3P policies. The compact policy
can optionally be used in addition to the full policy,
but it must not be used by itself.

Regards,

Lorrie Cranor
P3P Specification Working Group Chair


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rodgers, Philippa" <philippa.rodgers@attws.com>
To: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: Compact versus full P3P policy?


> 
> What is the general view on whether it's better to code your privacy
> statement into a compact P3P policy or a full P3P policy?  We know that
> M/soft's IE 6.0 supports the compact policy, and since they'll be the
> biggest driver of critical mass of P3P adoption is this the way to go?
> 
> What are the pros/cons of coding a full P3P policy?
> 
> thanks
> 
> Philippa Rodgers
> Director - e-business/Privacy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 10:42:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 January 2012 12:13:10 GMT