W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-policy@w3.org > October 2001

(unknown charset) Re: Using <meta http-equiv> [was: [www-p3p-policy] <none>]

From: (unknown charset) Ken Martin <ken@kpmartin.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:33:24 -0500
To: (unknown charset) <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
CC: (unknown charset) Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>, Andreas Färber <andreas@faerber.as>
Message-ID: <B7E9D473.17EDD%ken@kpmartin.com>
on 10/10/01 9:42 AM, Lorrie Cranor at lorrie@research.att.com wrote:

> Certainly if you are using a server that recognizes this and creates
> a normal HTTP header, then that is fine. But you should make sure
> your server does that before you use this approach. I don't
> think all servers will do this.

It's very easy to test by just adding the <meta> and then hitting the
changed page with the W3C P3P Validator, which let's you look at the whole
header. :)

In my recent struggles, I've found the <meta> method very handy as a
starting point, and have found it to work on Apache, Netscape, and WebStar

Unfortunately, lots of web programmers I have contact with have no clue
about HTTP headers or their server, and very many have no access to their
server at that level.

Ken Martin
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2001 11:35:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:07 UTC