W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-multimodal@w3.org > June 2012

RE: [arch] mc specific test assertions for cancel

From: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:23:34 -0400
To: "'Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka'" <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
Cc: <www-multimodal@w3.org>
Message-ID: <03ae01cd47ee$8d025020$a706f060$@conversational-technologies.com>
Hi Dirk,
We haven't received any other comments that would require republishing the IR Plan. We plan to republish in a few days with Assertion 24 removed. 
Please let us know if this resolution is acceptable.
Best regards,
Debbie Dahl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka [mailto:dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 4:03 AM
> To: Deborah Dahl
> Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [arch] mc specific test assertions for cancel
> 
> Hey Debbie,
> 
> are there further changes of this plan due to experiences that others
> mad? When will it be published?
> 
> Dirk
> 
> > Hi Dirk,
> > We've discussed your question in the Working Group, and we agree with
> your
> > suggestion that test assertions 178 (a modality component MUST return a
> > CancelResponse event in response to a CancelRequest) and assertion 24
> > (CancelResponse MUST be sent by the modality component as a response
> to the
> > CancelRequest) are basically duplicates. We plan to remove assertion 24
> and
> > republish the Implementation Report Plan.
> > Since we are tracking all comment threads at this point, please let us know
> > by June 15 if this resolution is acceptable, otherwise we will assume that
> > you agree with our decision (but it is very helpful to have an explicit
> > response).
> > Best regards,
> > Debbie Dahl, MMI WG Chair
> >
> >
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 16:24:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 June 2012 16:24:27 GMT