W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-multimodal@w3.org > May 2007

[EMMA] i18n comment: Definition of URI not normative

From: <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 09:44:39 +0100
To: www-multimodal@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070502084342.90CF04EFB2@homer.w3.org>

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-emma-20070409/

Comment 6
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-emma/
Editorial/substantive: S
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
2.1 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-emma-20070409/#s4.2.5]
definition of URI informative

Comment: 
A definition of URI is given in the Terminology section that defines it in terms of RFC 3986 and XML Schema Part 2:Datatypes, but that section is not normative. We think the definition of URI should be normative.
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 08:44:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 May 2007 08:44:00 GMT