RE: Proposal: Values for UAProf properties

Hello,

I have some comments on these proposed values:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: koch@pixelpark.com [mailto:koch@pixelpark.com]
> Sent: 29 May 2002 11:08
> To: www-mobile@w3.org
> Subject: Proposal: Values for UAProf properties
> 
[snip]
> 
> SecuritySupport:
> * WTLS-1
> * WTLS-2
> * WTLS-3
> * signText
> * PPTP
> * SSL-1
> * SSL-2
> * SSL-3

The UAProf Schemas don't define SecuritySupport as a bag - it is a
single Property. Therefore, if a phone supports WTLS 1 and WTLS 2, what
should it display? The current UA Profiles available seem to use "WTLS
Class 1/2" or similar.

[snip]
 
> WapVersion:
> * 1.1
> * 1.2
> * 1.2.1
> * 2.0

"1.2" will never be used. At least one current profile uses "1.2.1/June
2000".

> WmlVersion:
> * 1.1
> * 1.2
> * 1.3
> * 2.0

WML 1.2 won't be used either.
 
> WtaiLibraries:
> * WTAPublic
> * WTAVoiceCall
> * WTANetText
> * WTAPhoneBook
> * WTACallLog
> * WTAMisc
> * WTAGSM
> * WTAANSI136
> * WTAPDC
> * WTAIS95

As WTAI is not compulsory, there aren't many (if any) that support WTAI
fully - I suggest that the most important things to include would be the
ability to make Calls, Send DTMF tones and Add entries to the Phone
book. I therefore suggest a format such as:

WTA.Public.makeCall
WTA.Public.sendDTMF
WTA.Public.addPhonebook

> Unfortunately, the more recent WMLScript and WTA specs don't have
> version numbers. So it's not clear what e.g.
> <prf:WmlScriptVersion>1.2</prf:WmlScriptVersion>
> stands for.

There is a mention in the WAP 1.2.1 WmlScript Spec that the version is
1.1 - it hasn't changed since WAP 1.1.

Best Regards,

Nick Denny