Re: Potential f2f topics

Actually, an alternative to the mechanisms GEOPRIV is working on could be
mobile P3P... I think the joint workshop between the WAP Forum and W3C held
some thoughts in that regard.

Johan

Mark Baker wrote:

> Hi Johan,
>
> > Hi Mark,
> > I think the scope should be more tied to current W3C activities. For
> > instance, today we have "mobile profiles" from a lot of groups (CSS,
> > SVG, etc). These are actually not mobile, but minimal profiles. I think
> > it would be interesting to discuss how we could include mobile
> > technologies, such as positioning, into the W3C specification set.
>
> Good idea.  It seems like an obvious thing to want, but I haven't
> heard of any requirements for doing so.  Then again, I've been on
> leave for most of this year. 8-)
>
> Which reminds me ... There's a new IETF working group, GEOPRIV,
> that is relevant to your suggestion;
>
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/geopriv-charter.html
>
> > But remind me again: When was the F2F? Is it for the cross-WG meeting in
> > february?
>
> It has to be before then, as the IG charter expires in January.
> I think we can make that happen.
>
> MB

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  Johan Hjelm, Senior Specialist
     Ericsson Research Japan

  Read more about my recent book
http://www.wireless-information.net
************************************