W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-mobile@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Missing prefix in spec

From: Johan Hjelm <johan.hjelm@era-t.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 12:06:05 +0900
Message-ID: <3AF0CB1D.7F299887@era-t.ericsson.se>
To: Kazuhiro Kitagawa <kaz@w3.org>
CC: www-mobile@w3.org
Resolved in the discussion yesterday. See the minutes I just sent out (to the
CC/PP list).


Kazuhiro Kitagawa wrote:

> GabeW found a bug in the CCPP draft over on irc://openprojects.net/rdfig --
> here's an excerpt from the log:
> <GabeW> ok, so I am taking this example:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/
> <GabeW> <ccpp:component>
> <GabeW> <rdf:Description rdf:about="TerminalHardware">
> <GabeW> <rdf:type rdf:resource="HardwarePlatform" />
> <GabeW> <display>320x200</display>
> <GabeW> </rdf:Description>
> <GabeW> </ccpp:component>
> <GabeW> There is no default namespace declaration (there are namespace
> declarations for rdf and ccpp obviously)
> <AaronSw> Yes?
> <GabeW> So the content of the rdf:Description element contains an element
> <display> which is not defined in a namespace, I guess its defined by CCPP..
> the question is what the restrictions are on the content of RDF elements..
> and what does it mean?
> <AaronSw> Hmm, I think this is just a confusing bit of CCPP
> <AaronSw> I think that they expect you to mentally associate display with
> some namespace
> <AaronSw> I think I wrote to them about this, but I'll send this over to
> them as a heads up
> Hope this is helpful,
> --
> [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]

  Johan Hjelm, Senior Specialist
     Ericsson Research Japan

  Read more about my recent book

Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2001 23:06:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:02 UTC