W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-mobile@w3.org > March 2000

Re: WAP Competitors ?

From: Daniel Bertrand <dcb@worldpath.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:15:54 -0500
Message-ID: <38C3E7CA.28EB3818@worldpath.net>
To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
CC: www-mobile@w3.org
Okay, so HDML, WML, WBXML... This is getting confusing.
Up till now, most manufacturers had UPbrowser, it seems there will be
several to support now.
What should I serve to European clients to be on the safe side? Need to
start coding now!
Daniel Bertrand
http://www.say-parrot.com

Masayasu Ishikawa wrote:
> 
> "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > At 12:24 00/03/06 +1100, Andrew Scott wrote:
> > > Both WML and compact HTML have been submitted to the W3C as notes. Also,
> > > HDML (basically the predecessor to WML) has also been submitted to the
> > > W3C in the same way. You ought to be able to find these with a search.
> >
> > Please see http://www.w3.org/TR.
> 
> Or more conveniently, please look at:
> 
>         http://www.w3.org/Mobile/#submissions
> 
> Note that unlike WBXML, WML hasn't been submitted to the W3C.
> 
> > > There is a formal liaison process between the WAP Forum and the W3C for
> > > converging the standards. I don't think anything similar exists between
> > > NTT and the W3C.
> >
> > No. But NTT is a member of W3C.
> 
> More precisely, NTT DoCoMo is also a member of the W3C.  We don't need
> a formal "liaison" process with members.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
> W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Monday, 6 March 2000 12:16:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:02 UTC