Re: Content markups, piecewise functions, conditions

To: "Robert Miner" <RobertM@mathtype.com>
Subject: Re: Content markups, piecewise functions, conditions
From: "Stan Devitt" <jsdevitt@stratumtek.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 11:23:17 -0400
Cc: <w3c-math-wg@w3.org>, <www-math@w3.org>
From www-math-request@tux.w3.org Wed Jul 12 11: 18:16 2000
Organization: Stratum Technical Services Ltd.
References: <200007121454.JAA07202@wisdom.geomtech.com>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Miner" <RobertM@mathtype.com>
To: <jsdevitt@radicalflow.com>
Cc: <w3c-math-wg@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Content markups, piecewise functions, conditions


> > In 2.0 the first of these would look
> > something like:
> >
> >    <apply>
> >       <bvar>x</bvar>
> >       <csymbol definitionURL="mydefinitionforpiecewise">piecewise</csymbol>
> >       <apply><lt/> ....</apply>
> >       <apply><times/> ...</apply>
> >       <apply></lt/> ... </apply>
> >        value 2
> >        default value
> >   </apply>
>
> First of all, I thought that it was a hard and fast rule that in an
> <apply>, the operator (with or without qualifiers) always comes
> first.  But I presume this was just a slip in writing this out.
>
Yes, Robert,

This is an simple slip up.  Sorry for any confusion this may
have caused.  The bvar should come after the csymbol.

Stan.

References:

From:

Prev: Re: Content markups, piecewise functions, conditions
Next: Re: Content markups, piecewise functions, conditions
Index: Message index of www-math@w3.org mailing list
Thread: Thread index of www-math@w3.org mailing list