Re: Comments on MathML Last Call Draft (cont'd)

• To: kamthan@cs.concordia.ca
• Subject: Re: Comments on MathML Last Call Draft (cont'd)
• From: Robert Miner <rminer@geomtech.com>
• Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:27:11 -0500
• CC: www-math@w3.org
• From www-math-request@tux.w3.org Thu May 4 17: 27:16 2000
• In-reply-to: <3911AEAF.9726.BF2624@localhost> (kamthan@cs.concordia.ca)
• References: <3911AEAF.9726.BF2624@localhost>

Hi Pankaj,

> Why is the "math" element mentioned (late) in Chapter 7? Shouldn't some 
> of that be mentioned earlier; even earlier than Chapters 3 and 4? 

This is a good point.

> So some details on it could be mentioned before the example in 2.2.1., 
> which is the first instance where the reader sees any MathML markup. 

I'll look into doing this.  It sounds like a good place for it...

--Robert

----------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Miner                          http://www.webeq.com
Geometry Technologies, Inc.           email: rminer@geomtech.com
                                      phone: 651-223-2884
----------------------------------------------------------------

• Comments on MathML Last Call Draft (cont'd)
• From: "Pankaj Kamthan" <kamthan@cs.concordia.ca>

• Prev: Re: Comments on MathML Last Call Draft (cont'd)
• Next: Attribute Name Conflicts in IDL Interfaces for MathML DOM
• Index: Message index of www-math@w3.org mailing list
• Thread: Thread index of www-math@w3.org mailing list