Re: mstack and south carries

Again, I concur with David. After a fix for a crash (MathPlayer 4, public
beta 2 will have the fix), I get what David indicated.

    Neil


On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:07 AM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

> On 17/03/2015 09:48, Daniel Marques wrote:
>
> <mstack>
> <mscarries><mn location="s">1</mn></mscarries>
> <mscarries location="s"><mn>2</mn></mscarries>
> <mn>3</mn>
> <mn>4</mn>
> </mstack>
>
>
>  Then,
>>
>> .
>>
>> .
>>
>> 3
>>
>> 2
>>
>> 1
>>
>> 4
>>
>> Where the dots ‘.’ are used only to indicate some amount of vertical
>> space.
>>
>> Is that correct?
>>
>>
>
> No. the first is unaffected by the location attribute of the second row.
> It is positioned _as if_ the second row had location="n".
> so it is positioned above the first real row 3
>
>   % where 2 would have been with location=n
> 1 % south of where 2 would have been
> 3 % first normal row
> 2 % south carries on row 3
> 4 % second normal row
>
>
>
> David
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> ____________________________________________________________
> _____________________________
>
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and
> Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
>
> Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
>
>
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Microsoft Office 365.
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> ____________________________________________________________
> ______________________________
>

Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 17:07:38 UTC