- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:07:33 +0000
- To: Daniel Marques <dani@wiris.com>, Neil Soiffer <NeilS@dessci.com>
- CC: <www-math@w3.org>, <juan@wiris.com>, Esteve Badia <esteve@wiris.com>
On 17/03/2015 09:48, Daniel Marques wrote: <mstack> <mscarries><mn location="s">1</mn></mscarries> <mscarries location="s"><mn>2</mn></mscarries> <mn>3</mn> <mn>4</mn> </mstack> > Then, > > . > > . > > 3 > > 2 > > 1 > > 4 > > Where the dots ‘.’ are used only to indicate some amount of vertical space. > > Is that correct? > No. the first is unaffected by the location attribute of the second row. It is positioned _as if_ the second row had location="n". so it is positioned above the first real row 3 % where 2 would have been with location=n 1 % south of where 2 would have been 3 % first normal row 2 % south carries on row 3 4 % second normal row David _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Microsoft Office 365. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 11:08:10 UTC