- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 12:41:58 +0000
- To: <www-math@w3.org>
On 15/03/2015 10:30, David Carlisle wrote: > Thanks, fixed those in latest checkin. The ? was I suspect showing some > doubt about that character and I note that U+2A5E was added at Unicode > 3.2 which looks very similar and unicode-math assigns \doublebarwedge > giving the new name \vardoublebarwedge to U+2306. > > I've just removed the ? for now, but I wonder if the AMS entry should > align with unicode-math. I'll check with Barbara how she aligns the AMS > name to STIX. Confirmed with Barbara Beeton, the STIX mapping of AMS names does use 2A5E here so I moved the <AMS> entry to that. (No change in the mathml/html entity definitions) David
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2015 12:42:29 UTC