- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:20:43 +0000
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, www-math@w3.org
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On 08/11/2013 21:07, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > Hello MathML peeps! > > Your colleague from WebApps WG here. I am editor of the Custom > Elements spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/custom-elements/). > > This specification enables authors to define their own types of DOM > elements (hence the "custom elements" name). To distinguish "custom" > elements from "built-in" elements within the HTML namespace, we use > the presence of a dash (U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS character) in the tag > name of the element and a blacklist of pre-existing dash-containing > tag names: http://www.w3.org/TR/custom-elements/#concepts > > Naturally, this approach would only work if existing specifications > whose tag names coexist in HTML namespace (SVG and MatML) would avoid > creating elements with dash-containing names in the future revisions > of their specifications. > > SVG WG (via Tab Atkins, cc'd) already stated that they will do so. I > was hoping I coordinate the same with you guys. Can I get an amen? > :) > > Here's the spec bug that covers this: > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23256 > > Happy Friday! > As you know there is one existing one: <annotation-xml> . Speaking personally I don't think undertaking not to add more would be a problem, especially as there are no immediate plans to add any new elements. David
Received on Friday, 8 November 2013 21:21:17 UTC