From: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>

Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:22:04 -0400

To: <ion@ams.org>

Cc: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>, <www-math@w3.org>

Message-ID: <i7a9pqkomr.fsf@hilbert.math.albany.edu>

Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:22:04 -0400

To: <ion@ams.org>

Cc: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>, <www-math@w3.org>

Message-ID: <i7a9pqkomr.fsf@hilbert.math.albany.edu>

Patrick Ion <ion@ams.org> writes in part: > In general though, I'd suggest that a combination of SVG for larger > diagrams and MathML for equational decorations (the whole possibly to be > viewed as a math object) should be the way to go. . . . Focusing on whether the whole should be viewed as a math object: Is there any extant computer algebra system in which commutative diagrams are objects? Or, at least, are there plans for such? (Sage?) If so, where can one learn about the corresponding structures and function calls? -- BillReceived on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:22:34 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:22:34 GMT
*