W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Using content-MathML for computation and analysis in Science and Engineering

From: Peter Murray-Rust <pm286@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:00:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD2k14NbSaJta0nh8qRUct5a8w2-mtPRcA3OLArnZNrpcn9gAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruce Miller <bruce.miller@nist.gov>
Cc: Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net>, Daniel Marques <dani@wiris.com>, "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bruce Miller <bruce.miller@nist.gov> wrote:

> On 03/15/2012 10:24 AM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:As you said earlier in the
> thread: MathML has good
> declarative power. But to express programming or
> computations, you'll need imperative.
> At least simple things like distinguishing
> the declarative relationship k=0.1 from the
> imperative assignment k=0.1.
> Understood, I think. In my current implementation this sets/changes the
value of k within the current scope

> You'll have an easier time declaring the relationships
> in MathML than expressing the demand for their computations
> --- assuming your computational engine can figure out
> what to do.  However, if you do want to express the computations,
> I would encourage you to at least consider how those could
> be cast in MathML using apply, csymbol etc.  and in particular
> using a content dictionary with symbols for expressing those
> imperatives.  Could be useful to others!
> I'm probably not the best person to do this! I can make something that
"works" but it may not be idiomatic. Everything we do is (of course) Open
Source  so it's inspectable. when we have something running we'd be
grateful for comments. It's more important that it uses a pragmatic idiom
that's acceptable than breaks new ground in formal systems!

Thanks again

Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2012 16:00:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:44 UTC