From: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>

Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:26:39 -0500

To: Wendell P <wendellp@operamail.com>

Cc: <www-math@w3.org>

Message-ID: <i7vco8eujk.fsf@hilbert.math.albany.edu>

Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:26:39 -0500

To: Wendell P <wendellp@operamail.com>

Cc: <www-math@w3.org>

Message-ID: <i7vco8eujk.fsf@hilbert.math.albany.edu>

Wendell P <wendellp@operamail.com> writes: > Although I didn't see any past discussion of print typography here, > there doesn't seem to be any place else to bring this up. > > I would like to produce mathematical documents in an entirely XML > workflow. There are WYSIWYG editors that render SVG and MathML, several > good utilities for generating SVG illustrations, equation editors that > i/o MathML, and typsetting engines that take XML+SVG+MathML input. > > My main problem is that I have been unable to get sufficient quality in > the typesetting of equations. I would prefer quality like TeX, but would > be satisfied with that of MS Word 2007. OpenOffice is definitely not > good enough. One wants to begin with a suitable author-level SGML document type covering math but with higher level -- and more author-friendly -- markup for math than that of HTML+MathML. See my talk at TUG 2010 on "LaTeX profiles", http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/presentations/Tug2010/ -- BillReceived on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:27:06 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50
: Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:27:06 GMT
*