- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 12:27:02 +0100
- To: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- Cc: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>
On 30/07/2012 15:26, Frédéric WANG wrote: > Dear all, > > The "accent" attribute can be specified on mstyle but the MathML REC > does not seem to specify whether it applies to mo or munderover > descendants. Since "accentunder" is allowed on mstyle, I guess > "accent" applies to munderover descendants. That's not really a > problem if it applies to "mo" or not (mo@accent is used to determine > munderover@accent). However, that gives a dissymmetry between the > effect of mstyle@accentunder and mstyle@accent. So is it the intended > behavior that "accent" applies to both mo and munderover > descendants? > Speaking personally I think the answer has to be yes. Looking at 3.3.4 http://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/chapter3.html#presm.mstyle I think accent applies to munderover (and mover) because of the second bullet point and it applies to mo because of the third. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 11:27:26 UTC