- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:45:22 GMT
- To: wspr81@gmail.com
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
> The glyphs shown as examples for sans serif bold italic look as if > they're from the regular weight: It's 10 years ago and I'm not sure I have the sources, but I did tweak the metafont parameters taking a creative merge of the bold, slanted and sans serif parameters to come up with a bold sans serif slanted. Perhaps I wasn't creative enough, I agree it could be more bold. I recently discarded my script and bold script glyphs (which were identical) and replaced them with glyphs derived from the stix beta. perhaps I should do the same here? David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 09:46:01 UTC