W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > June 2009

Re: mathvariant vs. plane 1

From: Bruce Miller <bruce.miller@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:21:10 -0400
Message-id: <4A43A3F6.4010307@nist.gov>
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Cc: www-math@w3.org
David Carlisle wrote:
> what do you see in the 1D57 column of
> http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/1D5.html

It looks fine.
Like I say, on Firefox, I seem to be getting the
Plane 1 stuff pretty good (except for the gaps
where previously defined glyphs are omitted).

> I see bold fraktur there, the css specified in that case is
>  font-family: STIXGeneral, STIXGeneral-Italic, STIXGeneral-Bold, STIXGeneral-BoldItalic;

OK, but how would I use that to specify that an
<mi mathvariant="fraktur">W</mi> should use those fonts?

    @namespace mml url(http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML);
    mml|mi[mathvariant="fraktur"] {
          font-family:STIXGeneral, STIXGeneral-Italic, STIXGeneral-Bold, 
STIXGeneral-BoldItalic; }

doesn't seem to do it..
(which I guess makes sense, since I'm trying to specify the
font for "W", but the STIX font for plane-1 is for an
entirely different letter MATHEMATICAL FRAKTURE CAPITAL W,
or whatever)

> David
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
> and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
> Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
> powered by MessageLabs. 
> ________________________________________________________________________

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 16:22:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:41 UTC