W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > June 2009

Re: mathvariant vs. plane 1

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:03:15 +0100
Message-Id: <200906251403.n5PE3Fu1024292@edinburgh.nag.co.uk>
To: bruce.miller@nist.gov
Cc: www-math@w3.org

> I sure would like my Wronskians to be curly!
> I(ie. <mi mathvariant="script">W</mi> )
> IAlas, neither Firefox 3.0 nor Opera 10 support
> Imathvariant="script" (nor bold-script, fraktur,
> Ibold-fraktur or double-struck). MathPlayer 2
> Idoes, however (congratulations! :>)

Can't you add a css matching bold-fraktur so long as you have a suitable
font?


> But it gets interesting: all three support
> the Plane 1 sub-blocks for script, fraktur and
> double-struck, given appropriate fonts!
> (alas, still not bold-script, nor bold-fraktur).

In FF's case this depends on stix fonts getting sorted out, I think.

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 14:03:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:13:05 GMT