I noticed a couple of things that you did that were workarounds to get it to display in Firefox that might cause problems in other renderers:
- You use CSS to set the column alignments instead of using MathML. You list the Firefox bug that it doesn't implement columnalignments, but you should at least also add the columnalignments to the MathML so that other renderers will align properly.
- You set minsize/maxsize for the arrows in Cicho's Diagram. These should stretch on their own to be the proper size, but Firefox doesn't do this (I don't see it listed as a bug in your list).
It's really good to get complex tests like this. Thanks for the work.
Design Science, Inc.
~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, MathDaisy, WebEQ, Equation Editor ~
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:54 AM, <email@example.com>
Hello MathML Community,
While learning TeX and MathML, I wrote a one page website
that covers a range of mathematical formulas, I use the web-page
for testing some of a browser's MathML (presentation Markup)
capabilities. It might be of use to others, so here it is:
The equations are shown in 3 forms:
(all hyperlinked to the code that generated them)
1) an image the TeX presentation
2) an image of the MathML representation using STIX Beta fonts on Firefox 3.5
3) the present browser's representation of the equation using MathML
This way a person can see how TeX (produces a very good representation of
mathematical equations) compares with MathML on Firefox 3.5 using STIX beta
fonts, and how these both compare with their present browser's MathML
The page validates as 'XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0', validates as 'CSS level 2.1'
and the page passes the WAI automatic tests
Included on the web-page are a few useful links and some notes about lessons
I learned while making the web-page.
Feel free to make any Comments / suggestions / corrections.