W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > January 2008

importance of tie bars?

From: Robert Miner <robertm@dessci.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 07:26:56 -0800
Message-ID: <D1EFB337111B674B8F1BE155B01C6DD601169A05@franklin.corp.dessci>
To: <www-math@w3.org>
Hi all.

I've been talking to some people using MathML for chemistry lately, and got a question about tie bars, which can't usually be represented in MathML.  If I understand correctly, tie bars look like a horizontal bracket (i.e. '[') under an equation, and seem to be primarily used to point to two terms in an equation that are related in some way.  I'm not sure of this, but there is also probably a requirement to label the horizontal part of the notation.  E.g.

(x_0 + ... + x_i + ... x_n)^a = (x_0 + ... + x_i + ... x_n)^b
              |                               |
               -------------------------------
                       ith summand

I hope this comes out okay as ASCII art.

However, by their nature, they do not respect the equation nesting structure, and so are tricky in MathML.  Something like a <starttie/> ... <endtie/> type construct would be necessary.  There might also need to be an id, since presumably one can have several tie bars in an equation, and one would need to match the starts and ends.

I'm interested in hearing if lack of tie bars in MathML has been an issue for others.


--Robert

Dr. Robert Miner
Vice President, Research and Development
 
Design Science, Inc.
140 Pine Avenue, 4th Floor
Long Beach, California 90802
USA
Main:   (562) 432-2920
Direct: (651) 223-2883
Fax:    (651) 292-0014
robertm@dessci.com
www.dessci.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 15:27:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:13:00 GMT