On Apr 10, 2008, at 12:51, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> If the WHAT WG defines a way for serializing MathML as text/html, I >> think it should be (at least for conforming cases) a pure alternative >> infoset serialization for a subset of possible infosets (dirty >> words, I >> know) as opposed to just being something similar but subtly >> different. >> That is, I think conforming documents should be losslessly >> reserializable as XML *1.0* and the DOM nodes for the math stuff >> should >> report the uncolonified element name in lower case as localName and >> the >> MathML namespace URI as namespaceURI. (I guess tagName should do >> what is >> most compatible with MathPlayer.) > > Does what the spec says satisfy this? As far as I can tell, the spec satisfies the constraint I presented for conforming content except when free-form element (e.g. <mtext>) or attribute value (?) contains a form feed or a vertical tab. I expect the rendering behavior of form feeds and vertical tabs in <mtext> to be undefined, which is bad. I can't comment on the tagName/MathPlayer part due to lack of suitable testing environment. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:49:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:49:16 GMT