Re: "/>" (was Re: several messages about New Vocabularies in text/html

On Apr 2, 2008, at 18:59, David Carlisle wrote:
> So special-case script, but allowing /> syntax on any element but  
> _not_
> making it generate an empty element is just weird.


As it stands, it is not allowed in the conformance sense on any  
element--only on "void elements" that have a canonically empty content  
model.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 16:10:34 UTC