W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > October 2007

Re: MathML expression, conformance, DTD

From: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:45:04 -0400
To: www-math@w3.org
Message-ID: <i7ve9fdtpr.fsf@hilbert.math.albany.edu>

David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> writes:

> of a couple of editorial notes which I hoped would indicate that the
> current state is unstable  In particular the second note floats the idea
> of making a relax schema normative (and by implication making the dtd
> not normative).

Of course, I agree that relax would be better.

My one concern arises from my suspicion that free (in the sense of
software) tools for relax-ng based on java running in linux
may have silent problems that, when I last looked (maybe 18 months ago),
appeared to be rooted in the then available free java engine.

I hope we're beyond this now, but I don't know.

                                    -- Bill
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 12:45:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:39 UTC