- From: Paul Topping <pault@dessci.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:59:20 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Roger B. Sidje" <rbs@maths.uq.edu.au>
- Cc: <www-math@w3.org>, <dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org>, "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>
This has not been a problem so far. We usually produce MathML from interactive tools with an "m" namespace prefix. If XML islands really caught on, this might be a problem. Then we'd just change our default prefix to "mml" or even "mathml". > -----Original Message----- > From: dev-tech-mathml-bounces@lists.mozilla.org > [mailto:dev-tech-mathml-bounces@lists.mozilla.org] On Behalf > Of Ian Hickson > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 4:43 PM > To: Roger B. Sidje > Cc: www-math@w3.org; dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org; David Carlisle > Subject: Re: MathML-in-HTML5 > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Roger B. Sidje wrote: > > > > On 4/10/2006 9:19 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > > > So basically, it's the same as tag soup. I don't really see an > > > advantage to going down that route (with its complexities like > > > namespace prefixes, etc) > > > > Is it because you are thinking globally w.r.t. multiple mixings? > > No. It's just that anything with namespaces causes authors > confusion. I > don't see the advantages here outweighing the disadvantages. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E > )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ > _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. > `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-mathml mailing list > dev-tech-mathml@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-mathml >
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 23:59:27 UTC