I'm puzzled at this whole notion that XHTML is somehow hard (I find it easier). It seems to me that single (& fatal) problem for XHTML is that IE doesn't support it. Given that, it's hard to be optimistic about IE eventually supporting HTML5[*], let alone HTML5+MathML or anything else. In reference to "CMS" not reliably support XHTML, (depending on exactly what is meant by "CMS"), most web tools[**] seem unable to reliably generate (conformant) HTML either -- in the current web, there's little motivation. Again, it's hard to see that HTML5 will improve that. [*] Other than it accidentally digesting the tag-soup in a way vaguely reminiscent of what the author intended. [**] except those that are XML based in the first place. -- bruce.miller@nist.gov http://math.nist.gov/~BMiller/Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 17:02:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:59 GMT