W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > May 2006

Re: mover vs latin chars with diacriticals

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 13:09:20 +0100
Message-Id: <200605041209.k44C9KYQ000432@edinburgh.nag.co.uk>
To: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
CC: www-math@w3.org


> Regarding DSSSL, well I am using (in some sense) it when use XSL. XSL is a
> "subset" of DSSSL

Not at all. they have different syntaxes, different processing models
and different functionality.

>  and next version of DSSSL will be fully a superset of XSL.

Have you ever looked at DSSSL? (it's one of the few ISO standards that
you _can_ look at without paying money).

> Assuming this true (I did not check), two may be prefered over
> "infinite".

you only get infinite ways in mathml by including arbitrary redundant
mrow nesting and similar redundant features. If you going to do that for
mathml you may as well count including arbitrary numbers of zero width
spaces in a plain text Unicode encoding. It's about as relevant.

David




________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 12:14:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:58 GMT