W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Technical reasons for some options taken on design of MathML

From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:03:00 +0200
Message-ID: <442D7CE4.6090406@activemath.org>
To: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com
Cc: www-math@w3.org


juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote:
>> (I tend to love QMath for extensibility, http://www.matracas.org/, thereare many others).
>>     
> Sorry to say this, but Qmath does not fit some requirement and therefore cannot be used.
>   
So will you have to write your own tool ?

paul

Received on Friday, 31 March 2006 19:03:17 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com: "Re: Technical reasons for some options taken on design of MathML"
In reply to: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com: "Re: Technical reasons for some options taken on design of MathML"
Next in thread: juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com: "Re: Formal query about WG role and MathML-FAQ"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 20 February 2010 06:12:58 GMT