From: <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>

Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:09:26 -0700 (PDT)

Message-ID: <3037.217.124.69.201.1154110166.squirrel@webmail.canonicalscience.com>

To: <www-math@w3.org>

Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:09:26 -0700 (PDT)

Message-ID: <3037.217.124.69.201.1154110166.squirrel@webmail.canonicalscience.com>

To: <www-math@w3.org>

Robert Miner said: > Juan, > > Your proposal for attributes to record the generator, and 'profile' > seems like a good one to me. I think many people would find it useful. > I have added it to the list of things to consider for MathML 3. > > Specifying the values for the 'profile' will take some thought. From > your examples, I can see your general idea, but I can imagine that > attribute recording a number of different things. In particular, your > "TeX-annotation" example seems like it would be redundant with the the > annotation itself, since that <annotation> element would have a encoding > attribute. Would you like to say more about your ideas on that? > > Thanks for the constructive suggestion. > > --Robert > > Robert Miner > Director, New Product Development > W3C Math Working Group co-chair > > Design Science, Inc. > 140 Pine Avenue, 4th Floor > Long Beach, California 90802 > USA > Tel: (651) 223-2883 > Fax: (651) 292-0014 > robertm@dessci.com > www.dessci.com > ~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, WebEQ, Equation Editor, > TexAide ~ The idea was basic, you can change names, generalize, etc. No problem. The basic idea is that due to existence of parallel markup, fine parallel markup, OpenMath extensions, annotation and so one the variability of code in math is cuasi-infinite doing communication very difficult because each tool present one (or several 'profiles'). Take the case of \sin \pi it could be <math> <apply> <sin/> <pi/> </apply> </math> or <math> <apply> <sin/> <cn type="constant">π</cn> </apply> </math> or <math> <apply> <csymbol definitionURL="http://www.openmath.org/cd/transc1#sin"/> <cn type="constant">π</cn> </apply> </math> The code generated by each tool is as a kind of key specific to that tool in many cases. Once the tool studied one can transform the code from and to it. Now i know that HERMES introduce extra <mi> into the <ci> and that tools becoming from OpenMath prefer usage of csymbol extensions rather than c-MathML empty tags. Initially i thought of this for content MathML, but could be used for improvement of p-MathML code also. For instance, the introduction of an redudant <mstyle> at the end of the code is characteristic of ASCIIMathML, whereas, when i see an <msup><mrow/><mn>2</mn></msup><mi>base</mi> from ITeX i know that would be substituted by correct mprescript code. The 'profile' attribute (use any other name if prefer) would select between different posibilities from authors/generators, for instance you could obtain different code in function of options of the software, if you are using entity names or unicode numbers, if use different imput sintaxes (e.g. two of ASCIIMathML). The profile would be a record of some basic properties of that can understand and/or generate each tool you can write useful filter for input and output. Take the case of example p-MathML code listed here [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2006May/0003] If i know that a piece of code has been generated by ORCCAA (profile="normal") i wait extra <tex2mml> may be eliminated before send the fragment to any other MathML tools. Now i am doing experiences with communication between tools in c-MathML. I follows a similar thoutght i take c-MathML code generated from different tools and enter in Mathematica. Several (really many) examples offer error and one can easily see why? The tools are generating some profiles are not understood by Mathematica (and Mathematica can generate code is not understood by others). With a library of profiles and generators you can minimize errors in interchange of data between MathML tools. Something today do not working well. You also can do your software ignore fragments of code generated by superior profiles (new versions of tools for instance) and/or generators with superior capabilities. For instance if your software understood <math> <?context-mathml-directive log location left?> <apply><log/> <logbase><ci>7</ci></logbase> <ci>x</ci> <apply/> </math> that is great, but if does not understood the context PI then probably will generate error (this will be illustrated and discussed with more care iincluding detailed examples of codes and screenshots with failures from Mathematica online). With something like <math generator="context" profile="context-PI-included"> tool could ignore that fragment of code whereas <math generator="context" profile="standard-MathML"> could be analized. There many ideas to be discussed here and i am being not precise, but now i lack a lot of time, since canonical website is being tested for official launching. Juan R. Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 18:09:53 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:38 UTC
*