W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > February 2006

Re: asymp v. asymp?

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 23:36:08 GMT
Message-Id: <200602012336.XAA08976@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: dnedrow@usa.net
CC: www-math@w3.org

>  Shouldn't asymp actually point to  
> "asymptotically equal to", Unicode U+2243?

It depends if you mean "should" in some idealised world or "should" in a
world made complicated by some unfortunate historical accidents:-)


has whole section on asymp...

In short the mapping of asymp to 2248 makes no sense, but it's built in
to HTML and so built in to every desktop and mobile phone on the


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 23:36:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:37 UTC