Re: Choosing namespaces syntax for MathML

• From: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
• Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:36:56 -0500
• To: "White Lynx" <whitelynx@operamail.com>
• Cc: www-math@w3.org
• Message-ID: <i78xhbjzx3.fsf@hilbert.math.albany.edu>

"White Lynx" <whitelynx@operamail.com> writes:

> On the other hand namespace syntax in MathML everything is placed
> inside 'math' element and it is easy to avoid explicit namespace
> syntax by placing that single element in namespace via defining
> default attribute value in internal DTD. Here is example, showing
> that namespace syntax does not need to be awful:
> http://xml-maiden.com/temp/namespaces.xhtml

Is it the case that previous recommendations given here against the
use of internal declaration subsets are now stale?

Thanks.

                                    -- Bill

Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2006 20:37:10 UTC