W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > April 2006

mover vs latin chars with diacriticals

From: Neil Soiffer <neils@dessci.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:18:01 -0700
Message-ID: <D1EFB337111B674B8F1BE155B01C6DD60DB797@franklin.corp.dessci>
To: "Public MathML mailing list" <www-math@w3.org>
The Unicode blocks Latin Extended A, B, and Additional contain roman characters with various diacritical marks.  Eg, U+1E8B is "Latin small letter x with dot above" and is equivalent to "x" with the combining character U+0307.

I thought the MathML spec said that using <mover> was preferable to using these characters, but I didn't find anything.  This issue came up when looking at the output of a program -- sometimes it used characters in the Latin blocks and sometimes it used <mover>.  Dealing with multiple forms increases the complexity of most programs that process the MathML.

If the spec is currently silent on this (maybe I missed where it talked about it), do people think that the spec should recommend one form over the other?  If so which form?  [In case it is not obvious, I think <mover> should be recommended in the spec]

Neil Soiffer
Senior Scientist
Design Science, Inc.
~ Makers of Equation Editor, MathType, MathPlayer and MathFlow ~

Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 00:18:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:37 UTC