Re: Technical reasons for some options taken on design of MathML

Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
> juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com wrote:
>>> (I tend to love QMath for extensibility, http://www.matracas.org/,
thereare many others).
>>>
>> Sorry to say this, but Qmath does not fit some requirement and
therefore cannot be used.
>>
> So will you have to write your own tool ?

Please, look at

[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2006Feb/0012.html]

> paul


Juan R.

Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)

Received on Saturday, 1 April 2006 13:32:53 UTC