Re: "e-notation" missing from list on

"Michael Hucka" <mhucka@caltech.edu> writes:

> I'm not sure if this is the right place to report errata
> about the MathML 2 spec, but:

It is the right place. Thank you very much....

>
> A couple of us noticed that in section 4.4.1.1.2,
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-MathML2-20031021/chapter4.html#contm.cn
> the list of allowed values given for 'type' is missing the
> value "e-notation", which is an allowed value documented
> elsewhere in the MathML spec.

rings a bell... e-notation was missing on the schema, wasn't it?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2004May/0003.html

aha! And it was you who'd reported it.

Thanks! We'll include it in the errata when we publish them.

Max.

Received on Friday, 3 June 2005 09:58:47 UTC