- From: Neil Soiffer <NeilS@DesSci.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 15:43:46 -0700
- To: "William F. Hammond" <hammond@math.albany.edu>, "W3C MathML Discussion" <www-math@w3.org>
> Questions:
>
> 1. Not withstanding the existence of a unicode point for 'not greater
> 'than', is it correct that "<mo>≯</mo>" should yield
> a glyph like '>' overstruck with a glyph like '/'?
Yes it should. In fact, Unicode says that they should be equivalent, and a
good implementation will probably substitute the single glyph equivalent
(≯) rather than overlay the "/" on a ">". However, as you have found,
the support for combining chars in MathML applications is not very common,
so I would stick to using ≯ (≯) if possible.
As Paul just remarked, we are working on combining character support for
MathPlayer and it should be in a not too distant release (for arbitrary
values of "not too distant":-)
Neil
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2004 22:44:22 UTC