W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Question about example in MathML2 Spec (Second Edition)

From: Kobayashi <koba@antenna.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:24:11 +0900
To: Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>
Cc: www-math@w3.org
Message-Id: <20041103122411.9c6b38%koba@antenna.co.jp>


I am appreciated for your explanation. 

Yes, our engineer has selected to set movablelimit="true" for 
integrals in operator dictionary in MathML renderer for
XSL Formatter. 

It also seems to me the value is more appropriate.

Best regards,

Tokushige Kobayashi

> Reply to the original mail from:
>  Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>

Further, I think you analysis is correct: movablelimits should be
false for &Integral; and the scripts should always appear in the under
and over positions if you use an <munderover> element.

I think part of the problem here is that there is not very strong
agreement about whether movable limits should be true or false for
integrals.  It woudn't surprise me to learn that some software assumes
they should move, and changes their operator dictionary accordingly.


Dr. Robert Miner                                RobertM@dessci.com
W3C Math Interest Group Co-Chair                      651-223-2883
Design Science, Inc.   "How Science Communicates"   www.dessci.com

Tokushige Kobayashi
Antenna House, Inc.
E-mail koba@antenna.co.jp
WWW    http://www.antenna.co.jp/XML/ (Japanese)
WWW    http://www.antennahouse.com/ (English)
TEL    +81-3-3234-1361 (direct call)
FAX    +81-3-3221-9975

Let's migrate from a whiteboard to:
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 03:43:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:36 UTC